Sure enough, Barack Obama kept his promise. "The first thing I’d do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act." I'm sorry, but if this man truly feared God, truly served Him as he claims to, promoting abortion would never in a million years be his top priority. Everyone knows full well that Obama was elected primarily because of what he could do to help the economy. You'd think that would emerge as his top priority. But, no, he would rather propose increased government spending. He would rather allot taxpayer dollars toward abortions (oh, and more corporate bailout, er, I'm sorry, "stimulus").
But you know what's sad? I can't really blame him. He's actually remaining true to his promise. It's the American people that willfully elected him knowing that FOCA was his number one goal. The American people believed that his plans to redistribute the wealth outweighed any damage he might impose on human life. Let's review the implications of FOCA, shall we?
FOCA will do away with state laws on parental involvement, on partial birth abortion, and on all other protections. FOCA will compel taxpayer funding of abortions. FOCA will force faith-based hospitals and healthcare facilities to perform abortions. (taken from http://www.fightfoca.com/)
We would never advise a medical doctor to take a teenager's gall bladder out without parental consent. We would never advise a medical doctor to perform any major procedure on a minor without the parents being informed of all of the benefits and risks. Why on earth would we want a young girl to be able to make the decision to "terminate a pregnancy" on her own? Why would we ignore the research that has indicated that physical scarring and psychological hardship inevitably follow such a procedure? Why would we be in favor of "covering up" the girl's poor decision to have unprotected sex? Would we also be in favor of covering up teenage drug use? alcohol abuse? gang involvement? homicide? By all means, whatever the cost, don't tell their parents!!!
Why is there EVER a need to kill a full-term baby, to perfom a partial-birth abortion? Why should protecting this heinous crime be a priority of any administration?
Why should taxpayers be asked to pay for abortions of any kind...ever?
And why, in our free nation, would a faith-based hospital, be forced to perform an abortion against its conscience? Doesn't a woman seeking an abortion have the choice to go to a different hospital? I mean, why don't we just offer to come straight to her house to make it easier for her?
These are scary times indeed. This has nothing to do with protecting choice. It has everything to do with protecting entitlement. Proponents of abortion appealed to people's sense of entitlement and succeeded in cloaking murder in the guise of "choice." This is likely the greatest feat of rhetoric in American history. How were we ever duped like that? Just how stupid are we? Women have ALWAYS had a choice -- the choice to have irresponsible sex or not. The only exception is women who are raped (which is a tiny percentage of the abortion pie, by the way). But, advocates of BIG government believe it's the government's job to provide a way out for people who poorly exercise their freedom of choice. The American people have the right to act irresponsibly, right? They shouldn't have to follow through and actually carry an unwanted baby to term. That would be cruel and unusual. I mean, it's not as though there are thousands of families seeking to adopt that unwanted child because they themselves are not able to conceive naturally.
In one of the debates, Obama revealed his motivation for wanting Roe v. Wade's ruling to stand: he wants his daughters, Sasha and Malia, to have the right to choose an abortion. So, if one of his daughters were to end up pregnant before she was ready, Obama would rather see his grandbaby aborted than carried to full term and offered the same freedoms and opportunities that he himself has been given? What if that baby had the potential to become another President? What if that baby had the cure for cancer? I would rather his daughters act responsibly and never have to face an unwanted pregnancy to begin with.
But our new President doesn't just care about his own daughters; he cares about the whole world. Recently he expressed his support of the United Nations Population Fund. We should help pay for women all over the world to kill their babies...for the sake of population control. Again, the power of rhetoric...
How about we support the castration of rapists, the forced spaying of women who cannot afford to pay for children on her own? I'd sooner support measures as drastic as these. I'd be in favor of birth control medication being dispensed in other countries. These would be proactive ways to "control the population". But, no, we have to be reactive. We have to offer a way out, so that people can continue freely living irresposibly. I mean, we wouldn't want to deny them the great pleasures of unprotected sexual ecstasy, would we? Why would we promote self control? It's not as if it's a fruit of the Spirit or anything.
Why have we resigned ourselves to thinking, "people are going to act irresponsibly anyway"? If people aren't held to a higher standard, they sure will. That's the beauty of self-fulfilled prophecy.
After a campaign promising "change," he proceeded to appoint many of the same people that worked under Clinton's administration. But, boy, he sure did keep his word about FOCA. The audacity of hope indeed.
"For You formed my inward parts; you wove me in my mother's womb. I will give thanks to You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made...My frame was not hidden from You when I was made in secret and skillfully wrought in the depths of the earth. Your eyes have seen my unformed substance, and in Your book were all written the days that were ordained for me when as yet there was not one of them."
President Obama, either you believe the Word of God, or you don't.
Chatboard (0)